While you may find most New York Times bestsellers at the or public libraries, there are three you will not find.
“Fifty Shades of Grey,” “Fifty Shades Darker” and “Fifty Shades Freed” -- currently numbers one through three on the New York Times bestseller fiction list -- are not part of the Gwinnett County Public Library’s (GCPL) collection.
Would you like GCPL to carry the “Fifty Shades of Grey” trilogy? Why or why not? Tell us in the comments.
Deborah George, the division director for materials management at GCPL, explained the wildly popular books by E. L. James are “out of scope.”
The trilogy, referred to by some critics as “mommy porn,” is a series of erotic novels about the relationship between college student Anastasia Steele and businessman Christian Grey -- a man with a unique sexual appetite.
“Our collection development plan states that we do not collect self-proclaimed erotica, which is the primary reason for our decision not to purchase this and similar materials,” George wrote in an email to Dacula Patch.
GCPL is not the only library system to decide against carrying the highly successful erotic series. According to a FloridaToday.com report, the Brevard County Public Library system in Florida recently pulled “Fifty Shades of Grey” from its shelves after belatedly realizing the nature of the material.
“Nobody asked us to take it off the shelves. But we bought some copies before we realized what it was. We looked at it, because it’s been called ‘mommy porn’ and ‘soft porn.’ We don’t collect porn,” said Cathy Schweinsberg, library services director.
The question of whether or not “Fifty Shades of Grey” and its sequel are harmless erotica or something worse has created controversy.
RT.com asked, “The book has certainly found its fan base, but are thousands of women buying a book that encourages them to submit to male domination?”
In her "" review on Rochester Patch, counselor Ann O'Neill wrote, "As a therapist who specializes in women and girls’ issues, my caseload usually has one client who is in therapy because of a relationship with a controlling, disturbed man. It’s damned discouraging to see women eating up this book like it’s Greek yogurt."
Other reviewers are less focused on the BDSM (a combination of bondage and discipline, dominance and submission and sadism and masochism) aspect of the book and more on the entertainment value.
“In fact it's the definition of a page-turner: even if anyone unfamiliar with the world of BDSM is likely to turn the pages more out of horrified fascination than engagement with the characters. Gray’s sexual predilections are by turns shocking and banal, and the many sex scenes often toe-curling,” wrote Laura Barnett in The Telegraph.
Have you read “Fifty Shades of Grey” and its sequels? Is it a harmless read suitable for a library collection or damaging porn? Let us know in the comments.
You might also be interested in reading: